Tour de France 2011 stage 21 photos

Here’s the first few off the camera. Will upload and tag more later.

Posted in Tour de France | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Praise and honour from the first to the last

The greatest paradox of the Tour de France is that there is almost as much praise and honour to be accorded to the last placed rider as the first.

Thomas Voeckler defends the yellow jersey on stage 14 of the Tour de France

Thomas Voeckler defends the yellow jersey on stage 14 of the Tour de France. Photo: © Roberto Bettini

Thomas Voeckler has set up a fascinating final week by defending his position in the yellow jersey. If the Tour wanted to reset the balance and restore its image, then a win for a vehemently clean, French rider who never rides for second is the full card of big box ticked. That he should note, after the stage to Plateau de Beille, that he wouldn’t have been able to ride like that against Basso and Armstrong in 2004 tells you much about how the sport has changed.

I believe that the “contenders” think that they can crack him in the Alps when he finds himself in unknown territory and the high mountains. That belief looks less credible with every day he continues and ignores his brilliant race craft, along with the wider race picture.

Voeckler is tough as teak, copes well with expectations and has absolutely nothing to lose at this point. Europcar also has Pierre Rolland sitting in third place in the Maillot Blanc (best young rider) competition. His team boss Jene Rene Bernardeau has been around long enough to have learned every trick in the book.

So perhaps he will look to sling Rolland up the road in the Alps, or at least be happy to see Rein Taaramae (Cofidis) or Arnaud Jeannessson (FDJ) go with it. That way he can draw Team Sky into the chase as they will want to defend Rigoberto Uran’s lead in that competition.

Team Sky's Rigoberto Uran is in the white jersey after stepping into Bradley Wiggins' shoes. Photograph: Nicolas Bouvy/EPA

Team Sky's Rigoberto Uran is in the white jersey after stepping into Bradley Wiggins' shoes. Photograph: Nicolas Bouvy/EPA

Colombian Uran, part of Team Sky’s Plan B, has done a very good job of slotting into the lead group, climbing with the best without being forced to lead open the road for them. Matt Rendell, as passionate as a native about the brilliant gem of Colombian cycling, has been warning of his brilliance for some time.

The high mountain finishes of the Alpine stages should be to his advantage. What a wonderful revival of the Colombian flame that burned so bright in the 1980s it would be if he could finish inside the top 10 and/or claim the white jersey.

Meanwhile his former teammate, Andrey Amador of Movistar, is last in the young rider classification and Lanterne Rouge overall. A heavily bruised ankle notwithstanding he battles on, determined to make Paris.

Andrey Amador at the Tour de France 2011

Andrey Amador, Lanterne Rouge and the first Costa Rican at the Tour de France

The first rider from Central America (he’s from Costa Rica) to compete in the Tour, he is – to paraphrase Public Enemy – a hero with his face on a stamp. For the full score on him and the Lanterne Rouge, TDF Lanterne Rouge blog has a full profile of him and his stamp.

Posted in Tour de France | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bastille Day at Le Tour, fireworks guaranteed

Tour de France, Valréas, 2004

Look at little Tommy Voeckler in yellow back in 2004, doesn’t he look full of boyish energy? Photo by by Simon Aughton, on Flickr, used under Creative Commons licence.

 

Christian Prudhomme will be counting his blessings this Bastille Day, 14th July. I don’t think he could have imagined it working out so well when he put the route together.

Traditionally Bastille Day is like a secondary French Championships. All the other riders hate the first hour as the French teams beat each other senseless, trying to make sure their man is in the potentially stage-winning break.

As a national holiday, it guarantees big crowds roadside, exactly what organisers and spectators alike want to see. Barring bad weather, there are so many reasons that Thursday is going to be brilliant:

  • Tommy Voeckler, French housewives’ favourite, in yellow, “heroically” trying to defend the jersey against all-comers with (lack of) help from his Europcar squad. It’s a throwback to the heady summer of 2004.
  • First day in the mountains with a stage ripe for David Moncoutié to claim a farewell stage win
  • Luis Leon Sanchez with an outside hope of taking it off Voeckler if he can get in the break
  • Alberto Contador trying to take back some of his deficit on his rivals
  • Cadel Evans seconds off leading the Tour and in the form of his life
  • The Schleck brothers looking to place Andy in a winning position
  • Pure climbers off the leash as the King of the Mountains competition starts in earnest. Rigoberto Uran is my one to watch.

You just know it’s going to be worth watching.

Posted in Tour de France | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are the Schlecks really that afraid of Contador or just a bit hypocritical?

Alberto Contador is a great bike rider.  You can disagree if you like but his record as a Grand Tour rider calls you an idiot. Great riders win the Tour de France repeatedly, something he has done already. Reed Albergotti in the WSJ outlines the inconvenient truth of his talent.

I want Alberto Contador to win the Tour de France 2011. I want him to win because I like the way he rides, even if I hide behind my hands every time he does his signature victory salute.

“Wee Bert”, as I call him, has got cojones and a calm in the face of trouble that is remarkable. Take stage 1 for example:

“OH HAI! ALBERTO YOU CAN HAS 1’20″ HANDICAP?”

His response doesn’t seem to have been to flay the horses, panic and demand every  rider on his team at his call, as some have done when delayed involuntarily. That’s confidence in your own ability to take that time back. Well, confidence or balls of pure steel.

Remember what he did last year over the when he was impeded by Frank Schleck’s inability to keep it butter side up? Managed the gap, worked with the group, rode impressively for someone so unsuited to the cobbles. And did Andy Schleck wait for him as he followed Cancellara?

Remember what the Schlecks did when they got caught behind a crash last year? Was it:

a. “It was wet, there was oil, we crashed. That’s bike racing. We’ll pick ourselves up and look to make the time back in the mountains.”

b. “Fabian, can you use your magic yellow jersey to make the bad men who didn’t fall off stop racing?”

Or when Andy’s own user error shipped his chain? Was it

a. “Yeah that was a shit stupid shift to make there.”

b. “WAAAAA! Alberto didn’t play fair. He laughed at my mistake and carried on riding.”

You’d think he’d have gotten over it by now, but no:

Schleck said he forgave Contador for the move, but added he will never “forget it.”

“I would not have done this,” Schleck told L’Equipe this week. “A great champion doesn’t do things like this. I really was disappointed by his attitude that day.”

On Stage 1, when Contador and Sanchez hit the deck, who was among the teams pushing the pace on for their sprinter?

On Stage 7, when Horner was in a ditch and Wiggins lying by the side of the road, who was on the front pushing the pace for their sprinter?

Unless Stuey O’Grady has wound the clock back, Leopard-Trek haven’t brought a sprinter to this Tour. The impression it gives is not favourable.

Yes cycling is mercenary, but it is also meant to be honourable (not that it ever actually was). Great champions are meant to ride in a state of grace, spreading virtue along their path. It has to be that way, Andy says so.

Plenty of commentators have said that Andy Schleck lacks the ruthlessness to be a Tour winner. Frank’s claim to the throne is weaker, but as a foil he needs to remain close to his brother to pose any threat.

So putting time into a crashed rival should look a sign of them discovering what is needed to step up. Instead it looks like a lack of confidence in their own abilities against the clock, even to break Contador in the mountains.

Or at the very least there’s a hypocrisy, as noted by Radioshack’s Jani Brajkovic, who crashed out of the race in a pretty nasty fall, on seeing Leopard-Trek on the front when Horner and Wiggins were down:

Where is the hero, who is gonna neutralize the race, now? Hypocrates (sic)

86 retweets and counting suggests he’s not alone in his distaste. Yes, Radioshack have driven the pace when it suits them, but I’ve not seen them crow about being on the receiving end. Likewise BMC have drilled it for Cadel Evans, but he’s not one to complain. His response usually boils down to “it’s not what you want to happen, but that is bike racing.”

With Wiggins out and Radioshack stumbling around like a bunch of over-medicated geriatrics, that leaves Evans, Basso and Gesink as the remaining contenders. Of those Gesink has been par terre and Basso came into the race looking somewhat dessous par.

So there’s a four-way battle ahead: Contador, Evans and the two Schlecks. For me there’s only one person I’d like to see beat Contador or at least stand on the second step. And that would be historic in every sense.

Posted in Alberto Contador, Tour de France | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Tour de France selection – my 9 to watch

While Directeurs sportifs have been making difficult choices, I’ve got the liberty of not having to choose from the riders I’m paying. So here’s the nine riders I’ve selected to ride in the colours of Chasing Wheels (basically La Vie Claire vandalised with a marker pen and tippex).

We might be a bit light in the mountains and short on sprinters, but actually I reckon it’s a team that would have a pretty good shot at winning a stage and the overall.

Alberto Contador of Saxo Bank - Push aside everything else and he is an incredible rider, attempting an incredible double. When he goes, he’s gone and there is nothing more thrilling than him out of the saddle on a climb. If people can continue to eulogise Pantani, then there is a place for Wee Bert in the pantheon.

Amets Txurruka of Euskatel Euskadi – An old BBC 606 favourite with the coolest surname. How would you even start to pronounce it without a guide? Handy climber, very attacking. Plus everyone needs a carrot in their life and this one has won the prix combativité.

Anthony Delaplace of Saur Sojasun – The youngest rider in the race, born 11 September 1989. There is no better way to understand the race than through the experience of a young debutant.

Daniel Oss of Liquigas-Cannondale - Another Italian with his head in the wind. Great hair. Magnificent hair. The sort of powerhouse that every team needs.

David Moncoutié of Cofidis – he’s been labelled enigmatic and unambitious but he has been nothing but true to his morals and values throughout his career. It may be the sunset of his career, but he can walk away knowing he never crossed that line and that his talent was genuine. His palmares speak loudly of the shameful dishonesty of others.

Geraint Thomas of Team Sky - Super G, needs to sort his hair out. Looks like Sky could let him off guarding Bradley Wiggins to hunt for a stage win. And he’s still only 25.

Jens Voigt of Leopard Trek – Because if we’re going to watch out for the youngest, we’d better keep an eye on the coffin-dodgers too. Jens is Jens and everyone else is a soft white roll. If you still don’t get it, read his column on why he rides and inspires.

Manuel Quinziato of Team BMC Racing – He’s got great taste in music and is going to selflessly stick himself in wind for Cadel Evans. He studies for a law degree in the off-season. He’s a friend of my mate Perry and I’ve got some of his old Liquigas kit.

Philippe Gilbert of Omega Pharma-Lotto – The best one day rider of his generation. Proven winner and the lumpy first week offers plenty of opportunity for him to win stages, maybe even take a jersey. Classy and clean as a whistle.

I’ve been forced to pick a slightly different team for Tour Champion which is a bit of a bugger. Nonetheless I’m looking forward to seeing what a disastrous DS I turn out to be.

Posted in Tour de France | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

So who does BMC Soigneur Sven Schoutteten know?

Posted in Doping, Professional, Tour de France | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Tour de France infographic

 

Tour de France inforgraphic

Nearly there!

Thanks to Greg Jensen for sending me this. Yes, it’s an ad for USDish, a satellite dish installer/retailer, but it’s a cracking visualisation.

But better still are these mugs from the magnificent London hostelry that is Look Mum No Hands!. £15 for the set.

Look Mum No Hand! Tour de France mugs

Posted in Tour de France | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The only critical mass that matters

It’s Team Green Britain Bike Week, another of those pointless ghettoising weeks that litter the calendar, like National Doughnut Week.

One week of the year when a PR company tries to place cycling stories so that everyone can forget about them for the rest of the year. Media organisations hate these sort of things and editors frequently go out of their way to ignore them. Still think it’s worthwhile?

Ultimately, there’s only one critical mass that matters, and it’s not the one on Friday nights. It’s this one:

The Silk Road

(From At War With The Motorist which is one of the best reasoned blogs to deal with transport and cycling. Read it.)

I’ve picked up on this on the back of an article in the Sunday Times (£) and a post by Andrea from Velorution, entitled Critical Mass

Sunday Times article on commuter numbers

But when mainstream media awakes to the London velorution (Sunday Times above), it will not be long before councillors and mayor realise that the balance of power is shifting. And in this country, when the suits start to protest, people listen: “”there is a new breed of cyclist who wears a suit instead of biking gear who need greater protection”.

He is absolutely right. If politicians think there’s a vote that could transfer to them on an issue, they’ll start listening if there’s enough votes in it.

We’ve already seen anecdotal evidence of cycling facilities being an issue when choosing where to work (the Financial Times has coered this in the past but I can’t find the article) and the battle of Blackfriars Bridge is a test case for whether or not government takes the changing transport landscape seriously.

So if you want to know how to change the facilities and provision for cycling where you live, make the case with numbers on the road when it matters: Monday to Friday, peak hours.

Posted in Advocacy, Commuting, Culture, Cycle To Work, Transport | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

David Millar, Racing Through the Dark interview and review

I spoke to David Millar while he was doing his press tour of the UK. Unfortunately my interview didn’t run as planned but, in keeping with my policy of publishing where I can, I’ve decided to put the interview out here, unabridged. I spent a lot of time arranging the interview in my spare time so it seems a shame to let it go to waste.  Listen to it below

David Millar, Racing Through The Dark interview, 06 June 2011 by leguape

I didn’t see much point in going in on an aggressive line of questioning. I think that’s rewarded with some interesting answers on the role of the judiciary in fighting doping, the lack of a unified direction in the sport, the need for independent doping sanctions and other areas of the sport.

Racing Through The Dark review

Judging a book on the cover used to be a feature of Simon Mayo’s BBC Radio 5 live book reviews. David Millar’s Racing Through The Dark is clearly a book about the dark and the light of one man. It’s a stark portrait, cast in a harsh critical light, an interrogation of his worth and meaning.

The willingness to examine his own weaknesses and failings as a human being that make Racing Through The Dark a much better read than other cycling autobiographies. The human narrative of the relationships in Millar’s life lift the book some way above “how I won” banality. Millar’s view of his young self is “you were a bit of a wanker” and sets about unpicking how that led to his own downfall.

But it is also a posed portrait – selective and studied – which avoids a simple chronological retelling of his career in favour of following the story of his own fall and redemption as both a professional cyclist and as an individual.

The book initially traces Millar’s rise to the top of the sport. It follows his own arrested development, the search for his own sense of self through sport and ultimately the death of his own idealism as adult professionalism curtails childish amateurism.

The route into professional cycling is a well-worn narrative path: discovery of aptitude, initial successes and failures, the all-consuming desire “to turn pro” setting in motion an amateur career, ending with the signing of the first professional contract. Millar feigns resistance, citing the possibilities of art college, but with every page it’s an increasingly clear portrait of someone with a fierce determination to define himself by succeeding in the sport.

While physically Millar is a perfect fit, emotionally, socially and culturally he struggles to find himself in French cycling. This is the most fascinating aspect of the first act of the book as he details painful, monastic loneliness; crippling fear of failure; and his own zealotry in search of his goal.

Christophe Bassons talks of the “something missing” which pushes people towards success and which is a component of taking the “professional” decision to cheat. There’s a wistful envy in his description of his Cofidis teammate David Mouncoutié, whose own ambition is tempered by the knowledge that after cycling he has somewhere to go in the form of the family-run post office. Mouncoutié never succumbed to doping and it is implied that his moral compass never wavered because he knew that something else lay beyond the cloistered world of professional sport.

Millar, in contrast, turns pro not knowing what else he would have been and remains unaware of how his own human failings – a desire for approval, his projection onto the team of paternal authority – as they suck him closer to the drain of doping. That same lack of other options later becomes a grace as he tries to rebuild himself following his ban.

His rootless childhood fuels his desire to escape to the continent and re-make himself there. His experience as an ex-pat in Hong Kong and Englishman compliment each other and explain how he survived exile on the continent where others fail. Like many a joiner of the Foreign Legion, he seems to cut himself off from his friends and family as a means to surviving the initial shock while taking the opportunity to redefine himself in their absence and far from their influence.

The second act covers his professional career with Cofidis and how he came to dope. Millars enters the sport at a unique junction, post-Festina affair, when the sport was given a moment to re-invent itself and move away from the stigma of doping. The most damning aspect of Millar’s story is how indifference and venality from all parties squandered the opportunity.

Perhaps most alarming is the speed with which doping returned to the peloton and became endemic after Festina. It’s precisely as if nothing had changed. Indeed it hadn’t. In that context Millar’s moral collapse comes as no surprise, but the ease with which he crosses the line and the banality of it still strike me as an awkward truth.

The permissive attitude of teams like Cofidis is pitched as a contributing factor but equally clear is that Millar’s desire to succeed is to blame. The identity that he has lovingly built for himself – dandy, playboy, star – and which nobody seems to have challenged proves his undoing as he struggles to match the expectations of both himself and his team.

The final act is his redemption, the goal the book works towards from the first page. For me this proved far more interesting than the previous sections as we find out how his redemption has been less clear cut than some imagine. His return seemed to have been been more troubled than I had previously imagined with numerous obstacles along the way before his deliverance in the form of Team Slipstream, an unlikely band looking to escape their collective past.

But first he has much further to fall as the arrogance of a sporting star meets the French judicial system, both for his doping and his tax affairs.  While the judge makes use of the opportunity to get some training advice, the taxman simply wants what is owed forcing Millar into effective bankruptcy that cast a shadow over him until recently.

The book is at its most interesting when the subject is Millar is forced to cope with the world outside the bubble of adoration and stardom. It is a strength of the book that it engages as a human story as much, if not more than as a sporting one.

His relationships with key figures are well written and nuanced. It is this aspect which really gives the book a depth that pushes it beyond a niche cycling book and should engage the casual audience who have only ever heard of one race.

L’Equipier (not named for literary and personal reason rather than legal it seems – if you want to know, google it, it’s a matter of record) is as easy to understand as his sister Fran who is his supporter in the broadest sense, both cheering and chiding him in equal measure.

Perhaps most surprising is how close he is to Dave Brailsford, the Team GB mastermind, and how much Brailsford is willing to risk to support his friend at his lowest point. It says much about both men that Millar’s betrayal didn’t destroy their friendship and working relationship.

There are also some well drawn vignettes of some of the sport’s biggest characters, in particular the curious fish that is Lance Armstrong. Millar proves that he is no lapdog in one incident and his appraisal of Armstrong’s forceful character is well-judged enough to survive the lawyers’ wrath.

Elsewhere his appreciation of the likes of the Taylors (long-serving supporters of British cyclesport) and his ability to pick out the most interesting aspects of those around him help to move the story along without drawing too much away from his central narrative.

As a book tracing the problems and contradictions facing professional cycling in the seemingly endless procession of scandal it bridges an important period, the details of which we are only just starting to fully appreciate. There is another book to be written on the moral failure within the sport, but this serves as a bridgehead to exploring the more complex issues behind his experience.

Racing Through the Dark deserves to be recognised as one of the best books of recent times to explore the human cost of professional sport, something which autobiographies so often ignore in favour of the glory.

Racing Through The Dark is published on 16 June 2011 by Orion Books. My thanks to Angela at Orion for arranging the interview and to David Millar for his time.

Posted in Books, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Gerard Vroomen hits the mark with Contador and Schleck, but misses Riis

Since getting shuffled out as CEO of Cervelo, Gerard Vroomen seems to have become a lot more outspoken about the top tier of cycle sport. This section in an interview with Cyclingnews, about the tipping point in the relationship between CSC and Cervelo as well as the Contador case, is very telling and a point worth repeating:

“What happened with the Spanish federation and Contador was 100 per cent predictable and it’s the same in the [Frank] Schleck case. It was no surprise that the Luxembourg federation decided not to do anything. I thought the real turning point with our entire pro cycling sponsorship was the press release sent out when the Schleck thing broke. That for me was really the end of it. That was so bad and it assumed cycling fans were so stupid that I just didn’t get that at all. That for me was the end.”

Read the full interview on cyclingnews.com

It’s still one of the big mysteries as to how Frank Schleck has never taken flak for that and why he doesn’t get tarred with the same Puerto brush as Scarponi, Basso, Valverde and even the continuing – and as yet unproven – allegations of Contador’s involvement.

I wonder if Frank ever got that money back, or was several thousand Euro an acceptable loss to avoid bigger questions about why anyone would pay a gynaecologist masquerading as a cycling coach for training plans when his stock in trade was autologous blood doping?

I’d have been checking my statutory rights if I got mugged like that. It’s akin to being caught buying hooky designer gear on Ebay: you almost certainly knew it was going to be hooky when you bid for it, but you can’t really go showing your arse when you won it.

An easy ride for Vroomen?

I’m still a bit wary of his new “truth-speaker” persona. This is coming off the back of a mea culpa blog post apologising for describing the cycling media as being “uncritical”. Also this comes at a time when Vroomen is effectively “out” of the game as he is no longer CEO at Cervelo. And there’s plenty of people who make for good copy when they say things that are likely to be greeted with nodding approval.

He happily trashes Ivan Basso’s 2006 Giro win on a Cervelo and admit the failings of that moment to cyclingnews.com. But this is still someone who took his company into sponsorship with Bjarne Riis, never a rider with the most saintly of reputations, even before his own admissions of guilt.

The flip side is that experience – of involvement with people including Frank Schleck, Bryan Nygaard, Kim Andersen and Bjarne Riis – probably played a role in Cervelo Test Team coming into being. As a team and brand, they did something significant to move away from the old ways of presenting the sport and of acting within the sport.

For example, there’s the great Beyond The Peloton series of videos which have set a new benchmark for high quality hagiography among teams. They’re not completely without a critical edge, but they’re hardly Panorama, nor should expect them to be.

Then there’s the ethical stance on doping. How many teams would have pulled a rider from the Tour de France not for failing a test but for breaching internal policy on medical referrals? They did it to Xavier Florencio.

In a way, Vroomen’s situation is indicative of where professional cycling finds itself now: there is a movement for change, a rebuilding of trust and belief in the sport, but there is so much baggage attached that no one can truly speak without their past actions throwing up questions about their own complicity.

Posted in Doping, Professional | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment